Sample document

Sample privacy impact assessment: payroll and HR software hosted in Ontario

Example Machining is entrusting its payroll and employee files to a Canadian platform hosted in Ontario. Under the law, Ontario is outside Québec, and medical notes are part of the data.

The sections follow the Commission d’accès à l’information template. The findings and the sections of the law they cite come from hand-written rules; the purpose, the data flows and the conclusion were drafted by the tool from the organisation’s answers. The organisation, its people and its answers are fictional.

Download the PDF

Privacy impact assessment

Cloud payroll and human resources platform

Example Machining

Person in charge of the protection of personal information
Marc Example, Human Resources Director
Project
Cloud payroll and human resources platform
Project type
Acquisition or development of an information system
Date
September 25, 2026
Version
1

In-depth

Level of review

2

Findings

1 gap, 1 to confirm

0

Priority risks

high severity and likelihood

1

Vendors outside Québec

5

Measures

1Purpose and scope

Example Machining, a manufacturer with 80 employees, is replacing the payroll software installed on an office computer with a cloud payroll and human resources platform supplied by a Canadian vendor. The project falls under the acquisition or development of an information system. Example Machining is undertaking it to run payroll and produce tax slips, to keep employee files, and to manage absences and performance reviews. The information will not be used for any purpose other than these.

This assessment covers the personal information about Example Machining staff that the platform will hold. That information includes identification details, financial details, health information and employment information. The assessment concerns fewer than 100 people. Because of the health, financial and identification information involved, the sensitivity of the information is considered high. The assessment is limited to the platform and the purposes described here. It does not address any other system or use of this information.

Under the fourth paragraph of section 3.3 of the LPRPSP, the assessment is proportionate to the sensitivity of the information, the purposes of its use, its quantity, its distribution and the medium on which it is stored. On those factors, this assessment is carried out at a high level of detail.

  • LPRPSP: Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (CQLR, c. P-39.1).

2Personal information concerned

InformationNaturePersons concerned
Social insurance number, date of birth and addressIdentificationStaff
Salary, deductions and banking detailsFinancialStaff
Reasons for absence and medical notesHealthStaff
Performance reviewsEmploymentStaff
Factor (s. 3.3)Finding
Sensitivityhigh
PurposeRun payroll and produce tax slips; Keep employee files; Manage absences and performance reviews
QuantityFewer than 100 persons
DistributionAt least one processing outside Québec
MediumCloud

3Data flows

The personal information concerns the employees of Example Machining. It includes each employee's social insurance number, date of birth and address, as well as salary, deductions and banking details. It also covers reasons for absence with the related medical notes, and performance reviews. This information is entered into the cloud platform, where the vendor hosts and processes the payroll and human resources files. The vendor's servers are located in Ontario, so the information is processed in Canada but outside Québec. Example Machining has signed the vendor's standard contract, which serves as the written agreement with the vendor.

Within Example Machining, access to the information on the platform is limited to the staff who need it for their duties. No decision about employees is made exclusively by automated processing. The platform returns pay stubs, which employees view from their phones, and produces tax slips. Employees have not yet been informed of how their information is handled on the new platform.

No retention period has been defined for the information, and this remains to be confirmed. In particular, how long the vendor keeps the files of former employees has not been discussed with the vendor and remains to be confirmed.

Example Machining

OUTSIDE QUÉBEC

Payroll platform vendor

Hosting and processing of payroll and HR files

Canada, outside Québec · Written agreement: Yes

ProcessingVendorLocationIn QuébecWritten agreement
Hosting and processing of payroll and HR filesPayroll platform vendorCanada, outside QuébecNoYes

4Findings and risks

Findings

To confirmLPRPSP, ss. 23 and 3.2

No retention period defined

Section 23 requires destroying or anonymising information once the purposes of its collection are achieved, and section 3.2 requires policies governing its retention and destruction.

Answer: does not know

GapLPRPSP, s. 8

Persons concerned not informed

Section 8 requires informing the person concerned, when the information is collected, of the purposes, the means and their rights, and where applicable of the third parties it is communicated to and of the possibility that it be communicated outside Québec.

Answer: no

Risks

Severity ↑

High
12
3
Medium
Low
LowMediumHigh

Likelihood →

  1. 1Information processed outside Québec without adequate protection
  2. 2Unauthorised access to the information
  3. 3Retention longer than necessary
#RiskSeverityLikelihoodSections
1Information processed outside Québec without adequate protectionhighlowLPRPSP, s. 17
2Unauthorised access to the informationhighlowLPRPSP, ss. 20 and 10
3Retention longer than necessaryhighmediumLPRPSP, s. 23

5Communication outside Québec

Payroll platform vendor · Canada, outside Québec

Factor (s. 17)Finding
1. Sensitivity of the informationhigh
2. Purposes of its useHosting and processing of payroll and HR files
3. Protection measures, including contractual onesWritten agreement: Yes
4. Legal framework of the StateElsewhere in Canada, the private sector is governed by the federal act (PIPEDA) or by a provincial act recognised as substantially similar. These points describe the legal framework; they do not conclude that it is adequate.

The organisation’s conclusion (to complete): section 17 allows the communication if the assessment establishes that the information would receive adequate protection, and requires a written agreement.

6Measures adopted

The measures below follow from the characteristics of the project. For each one, the organisation states whether it is in place or planned, and who is responsible.

In placePlannedResponsible
Determine the purposes before collecting, and collect only the information necessary for them.LPRPSP, ss. 4 and 5
Take reasonable security measures given the sensitivity, purposes, quantity, distribution and medium of the information.LPRPSP, s. 10
Sign a written agreement with each vendor outside Québec that takes the results of this assessment into account.LPRPSP, s. 17
Inform the persons concerned, at collection, that their information may be communicated outside Québec.LPRPSP, s. 8
Set out the procedure for confidentiality incidents, and record each incident in the incident register.LPRPSP, ss. 3.5 and 3.8

7Conclusion

The assessment produced two findings. First, no retention period has been defined for the information held on the platform. Second, the employees concerned have not been informed of how their information is handled. It also identified three risks, each of high severity given the sensitivity of the information. The most likely is that information is kept longer than necessary, which is rated as a medium likelihood. The other two are processing outside Québec without adequate protection and unauthorised access to the information, both rated as a low likelihood.

Some points remain to be confirmed. These include the retention period for the information and, in particular, how long the vendor keeps the files of former employees, which has not yet been discussed with the vendor. Example Machining adopts the five measures set out in this document to address the findings and risks identified.

This document was drafted from the organisation’s answers. It applies the cited provisions to those answers and does not constitute legal advice. The organisation adopts it under the responsibility of its person in charge of the protection of personal information.

Adoption

The organisation adopts this assessment and the measures it sets out.

Name: Marc Example

Title: Human Resources Director

Date:

Signature:

Appendix: the organisation’s answers

QuestionAnswer
Project typeAcquisition or development of an information system
PurposesRun payroll and produce tax slips; Keep employee files; Manage absences and performance reviews
Use for a new purposeNo
QuantityFewer than 100 persons
MediumCloud
Retention period definedDoes not know
Access limited to staff who need itYes
Decision based exclusively on automated processingNo
Human review of the decisionNo
Identification, location or profiling technologyNo
Product offered to the public with privacy settingsNo
Collection from minors under 14No
Persons concerned informedNo
Communication in a structured format possibleYes
Person in charge consulted from the startYes

Now your project

You describe your project, the tool asks the questions and applies the law, and you leave with the same document in Word and PDF.

CAD 499 per project, plus taxes

How the tool works
Sample PIA (Québec Law 25): payroll and HR software | PEICH