Privacy impact assessment
Cloud payroll and human resources platform
Example Machining
- Person in charge of the protection of personal information
- Marc Example, Human Resources Director
- Project
- Cloud payroll and human resources platform
- Project type
- Acquisition or development of an information system
- Date
- September 25, 2026
- Version
- 1
In-depth
Level of review
2
Findings
1 gap, 1 to confirm
0
Priority risks
high severity and likelihood
1
Vendors outside Québec
5
Measures
1Purpose and scope
Example Machining, a manufacturer with 80 employees, is replacing the payroll software installed on an office computer with a cloud payroll and human resources platform supplied by a Canadian vendor. The project falls under the acquisition or development of an information system. Example Machining is undertaking it to run payroll and produce tax slips, to keep employee files, and to manage absences and performance reviews. The information will not be used for any purpose other than these.
This assessment covers the personal information about Example Machining staff that the platform will hold. That information includes identification details, financial details, health information and employment information. The assessment concerns fewer than 100 people. Because of the health, financial and identification information involved, the sensitivity of the information is considered high. The assessment is limited to the platform and the purposes described here. It does not address any other system or use of this information.
Under the fourth paragraph of section 3.3 of the LPRPSP, the assessment is proportionate to the sensitivity of the information, the purposes of its use, its quantity, its distribution and the medium on which it is stored. On those factors, this assessment is carried out at a high level of detail.
- LPRPSP: Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (CQLR, c. P-39.1).
2Personal information concerned
| Information | Nature | Persons concerned |
|---|---|---|
| Social insurance number, date of birth and address | Identification | Staff |
| Salary, deductions and banking details | Financial | Staff |
| Reasons for absence and medical notes | Health | Staff |
| Performance reviews | Employment | Staff |
| Factor (s. 3.3) | Finding |
|---|---|
| Sensitivity | high |
| Purpose | Run payroll and produce tax slips; Keep employee files; Manage absences and performance reviews |
| Quantity | Fewer than 100 persons |
| Distribution | At least one processing outside Québec |
| Medium | Cloud |
3Data flows
The personal information concerns the employees of Example Machining. It includes each employee's social insurance number, date of birth and address, as well as salary, deductions and banking details. It also covers reasons for absence with the related medical notes, and performance reviews. This information is entered into the cloud platform, where the vendor hosts and processes the payroll and human resources files. The vendor's servers are located in Ontario, so the information is processed in Canada but outside Québec. Example Machining has signed the vendor's standard contract, which serves as the written agreement with the vendor.
Within Example Machining, access to the information on the platform is limited to the staff who need it for their duties. No decision about employees is made exclusively by automated processing. The platform returns pay stubs, which employees view from their phones, and produces tax slips. Employees have not yet been informed of how their information is handled on the new platform.
No retention period has been defined for the information, and this remains to be confirmed. In particular, how long the vendor keeps the files of former employees has not been discussed with the vendor and remains to be confirmed.
OUTSIDE QUÉBEC
Payroll platform vendor
Hosting and processing of payroll and HR files
Canada, outside Québec · Written agreement: Yes
| Processing | Vendor | Location | In Québec | Written agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting and processing of payroll and HR files | Payroll platform vendor | Canada, outside Québec | No | Yes |
4Findings and risks
Findings
No retention period defined
Section 23 requires destroying or anonymising information once the purposes of its collection are achieved, and section 3.2 requires policies governing its retention and destruction.
Answer: does not know
Persons concerned not informed
Section 8 requires informing the person concerned, when the information is collected, of the purposes, the means and their rights, and where applicable of the third parties it is communicated to and of the possibility that it be communicated outside Québec.
Answer: no
Risks
Severity ↑
Likelihood →
- 1Information processed outside Québec without adequate protection
- 2Unauthorised access to the information
- 3Retention longer than necessary
| # | Risk | Severity | Likelihood | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Information processed outside Québec without adequate protection | high | low | LPRPSP, s. 17 |
| 2 | Unauthorised access to the information | high | low | LPRPSP, ss. 20 and 10 |
| 3 | Retention longer than necessary | high | medium | LPRPSP, s. 23 |
5Communication outside Québec
Payroll platform vendor · Canada, outside Québec
| Factor (s. 17) | Finding |
|---|---|
| 1. Sensitivity of the information | high |
| 2. Purposes of its use | Hosting and processing of payroll and HR files |
| 3. Protection measures, including contractual ones | Written agreement: Yes |
| 4. Legal framework of the State | Elsewhere in Canada, the private sector is governed by the federal act (PIPEDA) or by a provincial act recognised as substantially similar. These points describe the legal framework; they do not conclude that it is adequate. |
The organisation’s conclusion (to complete): section 17 allows the communication if the assessment establishes that the information would receive adequate protection, and requires a written agreement.
6Measures adopted
The measures below follow from the characteristics of the project. For each one, the organisation states whether it is in place or planned, and who is responsible.
7Conclusion
The assessment produced two findings. First, no retention period has been defined for the information held on the platform. Second, the employees concerned have not been informed of how their information is handled. It also identified three risks, each of high severity given the sensitivity of the information. The most likely is that information is kept longer than necessary, which is rated as a medium likelihood. The other two are processing outside Québec without adequate protection and unauthorised access to the information, both rated as a low likelihood.
Some points remain to be confirmed. These include the retention period for the information and, in particular, how long the vendor keeps the files of former employees, which has not yet been discussed with the vendor. Example Machining adopts the five measures set out in this document to address the findings and risks identified.
This document was drafted from the organisation’s answers. It applies the cited provisions to those answers and does not constitute legal advice. The organisation adopts it under the responsibility of its person in charge of the protection of personal information.
Adoption
The organisation adopts this assessment and the measures it sets out.
Name: Marc Example
Title: Human Resources Director
Date:
Signature:
Appendix: the organisation’s answers
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Project type | Acquisition or development of an information system |
| Purposes | Run payroll and produce tax slips; Keep employee files; Manage absences and performance reviews |
| Use for a new purpose | No |
| Quantity | Fewer than 100 persons |
| Medium | Cloud |
| Retention period defined | Does not know |
| Access limited to staff who need it | Yes |
| Decision based exclusively on automated processing | No |
| Human review of the decision | No |
| Identification, location or profiling technology | No |
| Product offered to the public with privacy settings | No |
| Collection from minors under 14 | No |
| Persons concerned informed | No |
| Communication in a structured format possible | Yes |
| Person in charge consulted from the start | Yes |