Privacy impact assessment
Website redesign and its quote request form
Example Renovation
- Person in charge of the protection of personal information
- Nadia Example, Co-owner
- Project
- Website redesign and its quote request form
- Project type
- Overhaul of an existing system
- Date
- September 25, 2026
- Version
- 1
In-depth
Level of review
2
Findings
1 gap, 1 to confirm
0
Priority risks
high severity and likelihood
4
Vendors outside Québec
5
Measures
1Purpose and scope
Example Renovation, a residential contractor, is redesigning its existing website. The new site will include a quote request form where visitors enter their name, email address, phone number, the address of the work, a description of their project and photos of their home. Example Renovation undertakes this project to receive quote requests through its website and to measure traffic on the site. The information collected will not be used for any purpose other than these two.
This assessment covers the personal information handled by the redesigned website. That includes the quote request form, the protection of the form against bots, the delivery of requests by email, the hosting of the site and of the database where requests are kept, and the measurement of site traffic. The project is expected to involve between 100 and 10,000 persons, and the information is handled in the cloud. The assessment does not extend to other systems or activities of Example Renovation that are not described here. In particular, it does not cover how quotes are prepared or followed up once a request has been received.
Under the fourth paragraph of section 3.3 of the LPRPSP, the assessment is proportionate to the sensitivity of the information, the purposes of its use, its quantity, its distribution and the medium on which it is stored. On those factors, this assessment is carried out at a high level of detail.
- LPRPSP: Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (CQLR, c. P-39.1).
2Personal information concerned
| Information | Nature | Persons concerned |
|---|---|---|
| Name, email and phone number | Contact details | Public |
| Address of the work | Contact details | Public |
| Project description and photos of the home | Other | Public |
| IP address and pages visited | Behaviour or preferences | Public |
| Factor (s. 3.3) | Finding |
|---|---|
| Sensitivity | medium |
| Purpose | Receive quote requests; Measure site traffic |
| Quantity | 100 to 10,000 persons |
| Distribution | At least one processing outside Québec |
| Medium | Cloud |
3Data flows
Personal information is collected directly from visitors to the website. Everyone who browses the site has their IP address and the pages they visit processed by a Canadian audience measurement tool, located outside Québec, which produces traffic statistics without setting cookies. Visitors who fill in the quote request form provide their name, email address, phone number, the address of the work, a description of their project and photos of their home. Before the request is submitted, the form is checked against bots by Google's reCAPTCHA service, which operates in the United States. Visitors are informed of this processing, and the privacy policy is being updated to name the vendors involved.
Once submitted, each request is stored in the website's database and is also sent to Example Renovation by email. The database and the site itself are hosted by a website host in the United States. The email is delivered through an email delivery service, also in the United States. Example Renovation has a written agreement with each of the four vendors.
Within Example Renovation, access to the information is limited to staff who need it. What comes back to Example Renovation is each quote request, received by email, and the traffic statistics produced by the audience measurement tool. No decision about visitors is made exclusively by automated means. No retention period has yet been defined for the requests kept in the database and in email, or for the traffic data, and this remains to be determined.
OUTSIDE QUÉBEC
Website host
Hosting of the site and its database
United States · Written agreement: Yes
Google (reCAPTCHA)
Protection of the form against bots
United States · Written agreement: Yes
Email delivery service
Delivery of requests by email
United States · Written agreement: Yes
Audience measurement tool
Cookieless traffic statistics
Canada, outside Québec · Written agreement: Yes
| Processing | Vendor | Location | In Québec | Written agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting of the site and its database | Website host | United States | No | Yes |
| Protection of the form against bots | Google (reCAPTCHA) | United States | No | Yes |
| Delivery of requests by email | Email delivery service | United States | No | Yes |
| Cookieless traffic statistics | Audience measurement tool | Canada, outside Québec | No | Yes |
4Findings and risks
Findings
No retention period defined
Section 23 requires destroying or anonymising information once the purposes of its collection are achieved, and section 3.2 requires policies governing its retention and destruction.
Answer: no
No communication in a structured format
Section 3.3 requires that the project allow computerised information collected from the person concerned to be communicated to them in a structured, commonly used technological format.
Answer: does not know
Risks
Severity ↑
Likelihood →
- 1Information processed outside Québec without adequate protection
- 2Unauthorised access to the information
- 3Retention longer than necessary
| # | Risk | Severity | Likelihood | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Information processed outside Québec without adequate protection | medium | low | LPRPSP, s. 17 |
| 2 | Unauthorised access to the information | medium | low | LPRPSP, ss. 20 and 10 |
| 3 | Retention longer than necessary | medium | high | LPRPSP, s. 23 |
5Communication outside Québec
Website host · United States
| Factor (s. 17) | Finding |
|---|---|
| 1. Sensitivity of the information | medium |
| 2. Purposes of its use | Hosting of the site and its database |
| 3. Protection measures, including contractual ones | Written agreement: Yes |
| 4. Legal framework of the State | The United States has no general federal privacy law. Protection varies by state and by sector, and government access regimes are broader than in Québec. These points describe the legal framework; they do not conclude that it is adequate. |
The organisation’s conclusion (to complete): section 17 allows the communication if the assessment establishes that the information would receive adequate protection, and requires a written agreement.
Google (reCAPTCHA) · United States
| Factor (s. 17) | Finding |
|---|---|
| 1. Sensitivity of the information | medium |
| 2. Purposes of its use | Protection of the form against bots |
| 3. Protection measures, including contractual ones | Written agreement: Yes |
| 4. Legal framework of the State | The United States has no general federal privacy law. Protection varies by state and by sector, and government access regimes are broader than in Québec. These points describe the legal framework; they do not conclude that it is adequate. |
The organisation’s conclusion (to complete): section 17 allows the communication if the assessment establishes that the information would receive adequate protection, and requires a written agreement.
Email delivery service · United States
| Factor (s. 17) | Finding |
|---|---|
| 1. Sensitivity of the information | medium |
| 2. Purposes of its use | Delivery of requests by email |
| 3. Protection measures, including contractual ones | Written agreement: Yes |
| 4. Legal framework of the State | The United States has no general federal privacy law. Protection varies by state and by sector, and government access regimes are broader than in Québec. These points describe the legal framework; they do not conclude that it is adequate. |
The organisation’s conclusion (to complete): section 17 allows the communication if the assessment establishes that the information would receive adequate protection, and requires a written agreement.
Audience measurement tool · Canada, outside Québec
| Factor (s. 17) | Finding |
|---|---|
| 1. Sensitivity of the information | medium |
| 2. Purposes of its use | Cookieless traffic statistics |
| 3. Protection measures, including contractual ones | Written agreement: Yes |
| 4. Legal framework of the State | Elsewhere in Canada, the private sector is governed by the federal act (PIPEDA) or by a provincial act recognised as substantially similar. These points describe the legal framework; they do not conclude that it is adequate. |
The organisation’s conclusion (to complete): section 17 allows the communication if the assessment establishes that the information would receive adequate protection, and requires a written agreement.
6Measures adopted
The measures below follow from the characteristics of the project. For each one, the organisation states whether it is in place or planned, and who is responsible.
7Conclusion
The assessment brought two findings to light. First, no retention period has been defined for the information collected through the website. Second, it remains to be confirmed whether Example Renovation is able to communicate personal information to a person who asks for it in a structured, commonly used technological format. The assessment also identified three risks. The main one is keeping information longer than necessary, judged of medium severity and high likelihood because no retention period exists. The other two are the processing of information outside Québec without adequate protection and unauthorised access to the information, each judged of medium severity and low likelihood. These risks arise in a context where three vendors process the information in the United States and requests may contain photos of the home and the address of the work.
Example Renovation adopts the five measures set out in this document to address these findings and risks. It will review their implementation with Nadia Example.
This document was drafted from the organisation’s answers. It applies the cited provisions to those answers and does not constitute legal advice. The organisation adopts it under the responsibility of its person in charge of the protection of personal information.
Adoption
The organisation adopts this assessment and the measures it sets out.
Name: Nadia Example
Title: Co-owner
Date:
Signature:
Appendix: the organisation’s answers
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Project type | Overhaul of an existing system |
| Purposes | Receive quote requests; Measure site traffic |
| Use for a new purpose | No |
| Quantity | 100 to 10,000 persons |
| Medium | Cloud |
| Retention period defined | No |
| Access limited to staff who need it | Yes |
| Decision based exclusively on automated processing | No |
| Human review of the decision | No |
| Identification, location or profiling technology | No |
| Product offered to the public with privacy settings | No |
| Collection from minors under 14 | No |
| Persons concerned informed | Yes |
| Communication in a structured format possible | Does not know |
| Person in charge consulted from the start | Yes |